• About

One Who Is Searching

One Who Is Searching

Tag Archives: Joseph Smith

By the Hand of Elijah

04 Wednesday Jan 2017

Posted by onewhoissearching in Uncategorized

≈ 19 Comments

Tags

Elijah, john the baptist, Joseph Smith, sealing

One of the earliest messages delivered from heaven to the prophet Joseph Smith was that the priesthood would be revealed “by the hand of Elijah the prophet”:

“Behold, I will reveal unto you the Priesthood, by the hand of Elijah the prophet, before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord. And he shall plant in the hearts of the children the promises made to the fathers, and hearts of the children shall turn to the their fathers. If it were not so, the whole earth would be utterly wasted at his coming.” (D&C 2:1-3)

In this passage Moroni indicates that the Priesthood would be “revealed” through Elijah. A typical definition of “revealed” includes the idea of disclosing or bringing to light something that was previously unknown–in this case, the “Priesthood.” The verses don’t necessary spell out in any more specific detail what exact priesthood, but they do connect priesthood to the idea of planting in the hearts of the children the promises made to the fathers.

Ever since the 1850’s when Orson Pratt gave a talk on the Latter-day Mission of Elijah the Mormon church has linked the visitation of Elijah as recorded in Section 110 to sealing keys supposedly received by Joseph in the Kirtland Temple on April 3, 1836. This view permeates all that the church does with respect to teachings around eternal marriage, celestial polygamy and the sealing together of families for eternity. This despite the fact that Section 110 says nothing about Elijah conferring anything by hand upon Joseph and Oliver.

“After this vision had closed, another great and glorious vision burst upon us; for Elijah the prophet, who was taken to heaven without tasting death, stood before us, and said:

Behold, the time has fully come, which was spoken of by the mouth of Malachi-testifying that he [Elijah] should be sent, before the great and dreadful day of the Lord come-

To turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the children to the fathers, lest the whole earth be smitten with a curse-

Therefore the keys of this dispensation are committed into your hands; and by this ye may know that the great and dreadful day of the Lord is near, even at the doors.” (D&C 110: 13-16)

Notice that Elijah only makes the declaration that “the keys of this dispensation are committed into your hands.” There is no evidence here that he laid hands upon their heads to give the priesthood or to convey authority. Read it very carefully.

A little history regarding Section 110 is in order. Many assume today that Joseph and Oliver shared this sacred experience with others after having it on April 3, 1836. This is simply not the case. This vision did not come to light until after Joseph, Oliver, and his brother, Warren were all deceased. The record we have was penned by Warren in the third person (D&C 110 is in the first person) in Joseph Smith’s journal. Following this event Joseph doesn’t make another journal entry until two years later in 1838! When he does it is in a completely new book-the previous journal being closed despite having additional pages left over. What gives? Joseph has just seen the Lord and 3 Old Testament prophets and he doesn’t tell anyone. How strange. You can read the original account here in the Joseph Smith papers.

When Brigham Young and his cohorts discovered the journal they published the account of the vision in the Deseret News on November 6, 1852. They must have realized that this event needed to be spun to support the “dispensation of the fulness of times” narrative which we have today. Section 110 (changed to the first person) was published in the 1876 version of the D&C, one year before Brigham’s death.

So where in Section 110 does it say that Elijah conveyed the keys of the dispensation of the fulness of times or laid hands on Joseph and Oliver?

The answer is nowhere. Read it carefully.

Elijah only says that the keys of THIS DISPENSATION are committed into your hands. To find out what “this” refers to you must read earlier verses 11 and 12:

“After this vision closed, the heavens were again opened unto us; and Moses appeared before us, and committed unto us the keys of the gathering of Israel from the four parts of the earth, and the leading of the ten tribes from the land of the north.

After this, Elias appeared, and committed the dispensation of the gospel of Abraham, saying that in us and our seed all generations after us should be blessed.”

Bingo. The keys being transferred are of the gathering of Israel and the Dispensation of the Gospel of Abraham. There is no other specific reference to keys being transferred or priesthood being conferred except for those two. We have previously explored the fact that the church was under condemnation for rejecting the covenant of consecration and that they had lost the fulness. What Section 110 is really telling us is that they had been downgraded to the preparatory Gospel of Abraham and that those keys were being committed into the hands of Joseph and Oliver, not the keys of the dispensation of the fulness of times as is commonly taught.

When you understand the downgrade, it is very easy to see why Joseph wanted to keep it a secret from the saints (I suspect the Lord commanded him to “seal up the vision” and not talk about it during his lifetime) and why he didn’t write in his journal for 2 years following the events of April 3, 1836.

Anciently, God made a covenant with Abraham that through him and his posterity all the nations of the earth would be blessed with the blessings of the gospel. Abraham was an evangelist (patriarch) who preached the preparatory gospel of repentance and baptism and that was what was re-instituted at the Kirtland Temple.

So the real mystery is WHEN DID ELIJAH CONVEY THE PRIESTHOOD BY HAND? What I am about to share was hard for me to believe at first. I had to dig into the scriptural evidence and cast off previous traditions of my fathers. I suggest you do the same by examining closely every evidence I am about to lay out for you that brought me to the following conclusion:

The Priesthood was conveyed to Joseph and Oliver by the hand of Elijah when they were ordained to the Priesthood that Aaron (Patriarchal Priesthood) by John the Baptist. The reason we can conclude it was the Patriarchal Priesthood is because of the all the spiritual blessings Joseph and Oliver received after being ordained — something that would not have attended an ordination under the Levitical (Aaronic) Priesthood which Joseph taught was only to administer cursings and not blessings.

In other words, John the Baptist is the reincarnation (transmigration) of Elijah the Tishbite.

Image result for john the baptist pictures

Now before you start to throw rocks let’s look at the evidence. Joseph made some startling changes to the Bible in his Inspired Version that clearly teach that John is Elijah.

In John 1:19-21 it is recorded that the Jews sent priests and Levites to inquire of John the Baptist as to who he was.  The King James Version records:

“And he confessed, and denied not; but confessed, I am not the Christ. And they asked him, What then? Art thou Elias? And he saith, I am not. Art thou that prophet? and he answered, No.” 

The Jews were asking whether or not John was Elijah (Elias is the Greek form of the Hebrew Elijah) and the Jews were sufficiently grounded in scripture to understand that Elijah would be returning. According to the account in the King James Version and other versions of the Bible, John the Baptist denies that he is Elijah. However, Joseph changes that in the Inspired Version:

“And this is the record of John when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou? And he confessed and denied not that he was Elias, but confessed, saying, I am not the Christ. And they asked him, saying, How then art thou Elias? and he said, I am not that Elias who was to restore all things. And they asked him, saying, Art thou that prophet? and he answered, No.” (Inspired Version, John 1:20-22)

So according to Joseph Smith’s version, John confesses and denies not that he is Elijah (the preparer) but disclaims that he is that Elijah who should restore all things. A discussion of the two Elijahs (the Preparer and the Restorer) is beyond the scope of this blogpost but I will tease you with the idea that Elijah the Preparer passed the keys to Elijah the Restorer.

There is another change made be Joseph that points to John being Elijah. It is found in Mark 9 where Jesus goes up to the mountain with Peter, James and John to be transfigured. The King James Version records:

“And there appeared unto them Elias with Moses: and they were talking with Jesus.” (Mark 9:4) 

Joseph clarifies:

“And there appeared unto them Elias with Moses, or in other words, John the Baptist and Moses; and they were talking with Jesus.” (Inspired Version Mark 9:3)

Image result for jesus transfiguration picture

The LDS version of the bible dictionary tries to explain this away with the following:

“The curious wording of JST Mark 9:3 does not imply that the Elias at the Transfiguration was John the Baptist, but that in addition to Elijah the prophet, John the Baptist was present.”

To which I would respond: It is not an implication, rather the wording is a direct statement. How many ways can you parse “or in other words?” But these are not the only evidences. Let’s examine John’s calling more closely from the scriptures. When Zacharias was visited by an angel he was told about his future son. He was informed that:

“…he shall be filled with the Holy Ghost, even from his mother’s womb.” (Luke 1:15)

The original manuscript version of D&C 84:28 informs us that John was baptized “while yet in the womb.” This has subsequently been changed to while in “his childhood” by an unknown hand. Both of these scriptures strongly suggest that John was previously baptized and filled with the Holy Ghost prior to his birth. That would certainly make sense if he were the reincarnation of Elijah the Tishbite.

Continuing in Luke we receive further clues about John.

“And he shall go before him in the spirit and power of Elias (Elijah), to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just; to make ready a people prepared for the Lord.” (Luke 1:17)

Holy Smokes! There is the link to Elijah and turning the hearts of the fathers to the children staring at us in plain sight. Think about John having the spirit and power of Elijah, because he was Elijah in another body with the calling to make ready a people prepared for the Lord. This is exactly what he did when he appeared to Joseph and revealed the priesthood BY HAND which would help turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, etc.  Joseph also taught that translated beings are designed for future missions (HC 4:425). What is to prevent that from being via reincarnation after being taken up to heaven without tasting death?

Image result for elijah pictures

It is pretty amazing how clear the doctrine is when you actually believe the scriptures instead of the interpretations that men have placed upon them. If the fact that John the Baptist is the transmigrated Elijah is still unbelievable to you I invite you to search diligently because the puzzle really does fit together when you cast off the blinders.

As you dig deeper in the scriptures you will also discover other instances where the phrase “turn the heart” is used (I suggest you do a word search on ‘turn the heart’) which provide additional clarity:

“Therefore, renounce war and proclaim peace, and seek diligently to turn the hearts of the children to the fathers, and the hearts of the fathers to the children; And again, the hearts of the Jews unto the prophets, and the prophets unto the Jews; lest I come and smite the whole earth with a curse, and all flesh be consumed before me” (D&C 98:16)

“And he shall plant in the hearts of the children the promises made to the fathers, and hearts of the children shall turn to the their fathers.” (D&C 2:2)

It is my contention that the promises to the fathers spoken of are associated with the Abrahamic covenant (the great Patriarchal father) whereby the gospel would be made available to the children and that through the ordinances of baptism for the dead, those who had passed on could also receive the blessings of the gospel. Joseph elaborates on this in a letter he wrote that is canonized as D&C Section 128 which links the concept of turning the hearts to the subject of baptism for the dead. After citing Malachi 4:5-6 he explains:

“I might have rendered a plainer translation to this, but it is sufficiently plain to suit my purpose as it stands.  It is sufficient to know, in this case, that the earth will be smitten with a curse unless there is a welding link of some kind or other between the fathers and the children, upon some subject or other–and behold what is that subject? It is the baptism for the dead. For we without them cannot be made perfect; neither can they without us be made perfect.” (D&C 128:18)

It all comes back to the simplicity of the baptismal covenant of the gospel. The turning that takes place is to the gospel covenant preached by the patriarchs (fathers) of old. When Elijah (John the Baptist) appeared to Joseph and Oliver on the banks of the Susquehanna River he revealed the Patriarchal Priesthood BY HAND which would unlock the key allowing for the preaching of the gospel and of turning the heart of the fathers to the children and the children to the fathers in preparation for the return of the Lord in the last days.

What is plainly taught in the scriptures has been tortured into another interpretation by men to justify abominations. Cursed is he who puts his trust in the arm of flesh. Don’t trust me either. Trust the scriptures and truly believe them.  John the Baptist is the reincarnated Elijah the Tishbite.

Keep Searching

Be Not Deceived — Two Keys

22 Saturday Nov 2014

Posted by onewhoissearching in Uncategorized

≈ 7 Comments

Tags

Brigham Young, Holy Spirit, Joseph F. Smith, Joseph Smith, LDS scriptures, scriptures

In the first post of this blog we explored the numerous commands of God to search the scriptures.  This post focuses on WHY this is so important.

And whoso treasureth up my word, shall not be deceived…  Joseph Smith-Matthew 1:37

For they that are wise and have received the truth, and have taken the Holy Spirit for their guide, and have not been deceived — verily I say unto you, they shall not be hewn down and cast into the fire, but shall abide the day.  D&C 45:57

The scriptures teach us two keys for not being deceived.  The first is to treasure up the words of life in the scriptures and the second is to take the Holy Spirit as a guide. Instructively, the Lord never tells us in the scriptures that the way to avoid being deceived is to follow a man, any man, even if he is sustained as a prophet.  In fact, the scriptures teach us that we are cursed when we trust in fallible mankind.

Cursed is he that putteth his trust in man, or maketh flesh his arm, or shall hearken unto the precepts of men, save their precepts shall be given by the power of the Holy Ghost.  2 Nephi 28:31

I will not put my trust in the arm of flesh; for I know that cursed is he that putteth his trust in the arm of flesh.  Yea, cursed is he that putteth his trust in man or maketh flesh his arm.  2 Nephi 4:34

One of the specific purposes for the Doctrine and Covenants as specified in the preamble (Section 1) is to teach us that …man should not counsel his fellow man, neither trust in the arm of flesh– D&C 1:19. In other words, we are to primarily look to the revelations, not to man.

Latter-day saints have been indoctrinated into believing that if they just follow the prophet that all will be well in Zion and we can never go astray.  From the very time you are in Primary you sing and chant:

Follow the prophet, follow the prophet, follow the prophet, don’t go astray..

Can’t you just see the little primary kiddies singing it with gusto!  I’m willing to bet it’s echoing in your head right now if you grew up LDS.

Plain and simple, it is not scriptural.  There is nowhere in the scriptures that the Lord tells us that a prophet cannot lead us astray.  Many leaders have quoted from talks given by Wilford Woodruff following the issuance of the Manifesto ending polygamy wherein he states:

“I say to Israel, the Lord will never permit me or any other man who stands as President of this Church to lead you astray.  It is not in the programme.  It is not in the mind of God.  If I were to attempt that, the Lord would remove me out of my place, and so He will any other man who attempts to lead the children of men astray from the oracles of God and from their duty.”

It is interesting to note that the version of this placed in the LDS scriptures omits the “I say to Israel” qualifier.

So think about this for a minute.  Wilford is telling us that the Lord will intervene to take away a prophet’s free agency (by taking his life) just so we don’t have to exercise our own agency to determine by the Holy Spirit whether he is being led by the Lord or not! Is that not wholly inconsistent with key principles of the Gospel regarding free agency? Is it not wholly inconsistent with the principle of common consent?

When you understand the historical context of the time, many saints thought he actually was leading them astray by ending the practice of polygamy.  He had to assure them that he wasn’t with some very strong language.  A myth is born.

The other prophet myth in Mormondom is the notion that if the prophet teaches a false doctrine and we follow it (because, of course, he could never lead us astray) that somehow we will be blessed for our blind obedience.  Marion G. Romney, a member of the first presidency during the Spencer W. Kimball administration shared a story that is largely responsible for perpetuating this false idea.

“I remember years ago when I was a bishop I had President Heber J. Grant talk to our ward.  After the meeting I drove him home…Standing by me, he put his arm over my shoulder and said: ‘My boy, you always keep your eye on the President of the Church and if he ever tells you to do anything, and it is wrong, and you do it, the Lord will bless you for it.’ Then with a twinkle in his eye, he said, ‘But you don’t need to worry. The Lord will never let his mouthpiece lead the people astray.'”  (Conference Report, October 1960, P.78.)

Amazing.  Not only one unscriptural doctrine, but two in the same paragraph.  The prophet will never lead the people astray AND if you blindly follow him even if he is wrong you will be blessed. This belief is so prevalent in LDS society today.  My mother taught it to me when I was growing up.  Today we hear this even more often.  Ezra Taft Benson gave a talk at BYU in June 1981 entitled “Fourteen Fundamentals in Following the Prophet.”  The prophet at the time, Spencer W. Kimball, according to his biographer was troubled by the talk to the extent he required that Elder Benson clarify and explain himself to the general authorities.  However, today, when we hear a GA quote from this talk there appears to be no blowback from any quarter.

Prophet worship has become so ingrained that I even had a member try to convince me that the guys should all try to emulate Thomas S. Monson in the way that we dress.  He must be blissfully unaware (as most of us are as a people) that the “Lord seeth not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the Lord looketh on the heart. (1 Samuel 16:7)

So now let’s turn to the scriptures and see what the Lord teaches us about prophets.

First off, the D&C has a provision and procedure for excommunicating the President of the High Priesthood (D&C 107:82-84).  If the Lord were to personally take responsibility for all the actions of the prophet (which as we mentioned above is in violation of the principle of free agency) then there would be no need for Him to give us that procedure in Section 107.  It is because men are fallible that he has placed that provision in our scriptures.

More importantly, however, is the fact that if you search the scriptures you realize there is a consistent theme around how the Lord tests his people.  He occasionally uses prophets to see whether or not his people will follow the prophet or follow Him. We never hear about this in sunday school.

Read 1 Kings 13.  It is the story of a prophet who was given a message to deliver to the king.  He was told by the Lord not to stop along the way either going or returning. On his way back another prophet told him that an angel had instructed him to feed the prophet and put him up for the night.  He stayed overnight and the next day was eaten by a lion on the way home. The JST clarifies that this was done to test the prophet. Incredible.

I mentioned this passage of scripture to a former stake president and mission president who immediately dismissed it as being in the OT and that prophets back then weren’t like prophets today.  His conclusion was entirely based upon reading the chapter heading (because, of course, a prophet, seer and revelator had approved those very words).  He didn’t even bother to read the story.  Question: Since when did someone’s synopsis or interpretation of scripture become scripture?  This has happened to me more than once with some very high level leadership.

Read Ezekiel 14.  In the first few verses of this chapter, the Lord says he will give a false answer to someone who asks with an iniquitous heart.  This should be a lesson for all of us.  We really will get what we ask for even if it is to our own destruction.  Recall that the Lord finally relented in allowing Joseph to lend the Book of Mormon manuscript to Martin Harris.  The Lord had already given Joseph an answer several times, but he wouldn’t take no for an answer.

Read Jeremiah 35.  Jeremiah is commanded to tempt the Rechabites.  They refuse to follow Jeremiah and are blessed for it.  The scripture heading on that chapter states that “The Rechabites are commended and blessed for their obedience.”  Whoever wrote that one failed to mention that the Rechabites were commended because they DIDN’T follow the prophet who under the Lord’s direction was tempting them with a false commandment. They were blessed because they were obedient to God.  Oops.

Could this happen in our day?  Has it already happened?  I need not go into all the doctrines that were perpetuated during the administration of Brigham Young, including the Adam-God doctrine, polygamy, blood atonement, the restrictions on blacks in the priesthood, etc. that the church is desperately trying to walk back today. This despite the fact that Brigham Young once said that every sermon he ever preached could be considered scripture.  There is a reason why you cannot access the Journal of Discourses on the Church’s website.

Despite my tongue-in-cheek jab at Brother Brigham, he also said some mighty profound things on this particular topic:

“I am more afraid that this people have so much confidence in their leaders that they will not inquire for themselves of God whether they are led by him.  I am fearful they settle down in a state of blind self-security, trusting their eternal destiny in the hands of their leaders with a reckless confidence that in itself would thwart the purposes of God in their salvation…Let every man and woman know, by the whispering of the Spirit of God to themselves, whether their leaders are walking in the path the Lord dictates, or not.” Discourses of Brigham Young, 135

“..if He (God) should suffer him (Joseph Smith) to lead the people astray, it would be because they ought to be led astray…it would be because they deserved it…”  JD 4:297-298

Obviously, Brigham Young didn’t buy into the Wilford Woodruff argument that has become essentially scripture to modern Mormons.  Just because leaders quote each other saying that the Lord will never allow them to lead the church astray doesn’t mean the Lord has said it, no matter how often it is repeated.

Let’s conclude with a quote from Joseph F. Smith (someone who is also responsible for perpetuating the “Lord will never allow…” myth).  However, in this case I think he is spot on.

“It makes no difference what is written or what anyone has said, if what has been said is in conflict with what the Lord has revealed, we can set it aside. My words, and the teachings of any other member of the Church, high or low, if they do not square with the revelations, we need not accept them. Let us have this matter clear. We have accepted the four standard works as the measuring yardsticks, or balances, by which we measure every man’s doctrine.” (Doctrines of Salvation, 3:203)

There you have it.  The scriptures in conjunction with the Holy Ghost are the keys to not being deceived, and that is WHY we must become more conversant with the scriptures and search them diligently to find the truth.  In fact, as we will see going forward, I believe the scriptures hold the answers to the vexing issues around Joseph Smith and the difficult questions about early Mormon history.

Are you searching?

Next Up: The good news first…The Marvelous Work is a future event.

Post History

  • Hallelujah! The Heavens Have Parted.
  • Iron Rod Podcast 007 & 008 — Church History Overview
  • Iron Rod Podcast 006 — The Nature of God
  • Iron Rod Podcast 005 — The Lectures on Faith
  • Iron Rod Podcast 004 – Role of Prophets
  • Iron Rod Podcast 003
  • Iron Rod Podcast 002 – How to Search
  • Iron Rod Podcast Announcement
  • No Rain
  • Elevating Jesus
  • Denver’s Sleight of Hand
  • Aw, Brigham. Really?
  • Priesthood Evidence
  • The Burden of the Lord
  • The Law of the Lord – Part 3
  • The Law of the Lord – Part 2
  • The Law of the Lord — Part 1
  • By the Hand of Elijah
  • The Great Priesthood Inversion
  • Section 132 – Standing Alone to Change the Simple Doctrine of Christ
  • Who’s Afraid of Section 77?
  • To Know the LORD – Part 3
  • To Know the LORD – Part 2
  • To Know the LORD – Part 1
  • Under Falsehood Have We Hid Ourselves
  • King Follett Discourse: Redefining God in our Own Image
  • Blind and Deaf
  • Vengence is Mine Saith the Lord
  • For a Small Moment Have I Forsaken Thee
  • Rowe v. Scriptures
  • Latter-day Road Map
  • What It Means to Be Sealed
  • I am not a High Priest…
  • Review of the “Boise Rescue” with Elder Oaks and Brother Turley
  • Don’t Conflate the Church with the Gospel
  • Latter-Day Scapegoat
  • One Like Unto Moses
  • We Don’t Need to Defend Joseph’s Polygamy
  • Spiritual Food Stamps
  • Where is the Fulness?

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 109 other subscribers

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Follow Following
    • One Who Is Searching
    • Join 109 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • One Who Is Searching
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar